Animacy Totally Explained

Everything about Animacy totally explained

Animacy is a grammatical category, usually of nouns, which influences the form a verb takes when it's associated with that noun. Usually, animacy has to do with how alive or how sentient the referent of a noun is. In general, personal pronouns have the highest animacy, the first-person being the highest among them. Other humans follow them, and animals, plants, natural forces such as winds, concrete things, and abstract things follow in this order; however, according to the spiritual beliefs of the people whose language possesses an animacy hierarchy, deities, spirits, or certain types of animal or plant may be ranked very highly in the hierarchy.

Examples

The distinction between he/she and it is a distinction in animacy; some languages, such as Turkish and spoken Finnish don't distinguish between s/he and it. English, on the other hand, shows a similar lack of distinction between they animate and they inanimate.
Animacy plays some roles in English, as in any other language. For example, the higher animacy a referent has, the less preferable it's to use the preposition of for possession, as follows:

My face is correct, while *the face of me is not.
The man's face and the face of the man are both correct, and the former is preferred.
The clock's face and the face of the clock are both correct, and the latter is preferred.

Examples of languages in which an animacy hierarchy is important include the Mexican language Totonac and the Southern Athabaskan languages (such as Western Apache and Navajo), whose animacy hierarchy has been the subject of intense study. The Tamil language has a noun classification based on animacy.

Apachean

Like most Athabaskan languages, Southern Athabaskan languages show various levels of animacy in their grammar, with certain nouns taking specific verb forms according to their rank in this animacy hierarchy. For instance, Navajo nouns can be ranked by animacy on a continuum from most animate (a human) to least animate (an abstraction) (Young & Morgan 1987: 65-66):
Human > Infant/Big Animal > Medium-sized Animal > Small Animal > Natural Force > Abstraction
Generally, the most animate noun in a sentence must occur first while the noun with lesser animacy occurs second. If both nouns are equal in animacy, then either noun can occur in the first position. So, both example sentences (1) and (2) are correct. The yi- prefix on the verb indicates that the 1st noun is the subject and bi- indicates that the 2nd noun is the subject.

(1)	Ashkii	at’ééd	yiníł’į́
	boy	girl	yi-look
	'The boy is looking at the girl.'

(2)	At’ééd	ashkii	biníł’į́
	girl	boy	bi-look
	'The girl is being looked at by the boy.'

But example sentence (3) sounds wrong to most Navajo speakers because the less animate noun occurs before the more animate noun:

(3)	*Tsídii	at’ééd	yishtąsh
	bird	girl	yi-pecked
	*'The bird pecked the girl.'

In order to express this idea, the more animate noun must occur first, as in sentence (4):

(4)	At’ééd	tsídi	bishtąsh
	girl	bird	bi-pecked
	'The girl was pecked by the bird.'

Japanese

Although nouns in Japanese are not marked for animacy, it has two existential/possessive verbs; one which for implicitly animate nouns (usually humans and animals) and one for implicitly inanimate nouns (usually non-living objects and plants, etc.) The verb iru (いる also written 居る）is used to show the existence or possession of an animate noun. The verb aru (ある, sometimes written 在る when existential or 有る when possessive) is used to show the existence or possession of an inanimate noun.
An animate noun, in this case 'cat,' is marked as the subject of the verb with the subject particle ga (が), but no topic and no location are marked. This implies the noun is indefinite and merely exists.

(1)	Neko	ga	iru.
	猫	が	いる
	cat	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'There is a cat.'

In the second example, a topic is introduced, in this case "I", with the topic particle ha (は). The animate noun is again marked with a subject particle, and no location is denoted. This implies that the topic owns, or perhaps is holding onto, the noun.

(2)	Watashi	wa	neko	ga	iru.
	私	は	猫	が	いる
	I	TOPIC	cat	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'I have a cat.'

In the third example the noun is marked as the topic (and by default functions as the subject of the verb) while a location, in this case the top of a chair, is marked with the location particle ni (に). This implies that the noun is both a definite noun and that's located at the specified location.

(2)	Neko	wa	isu no ue	ni	iru.
	猫	は	椅子の上	に	いる
	cat	TOPIC	chair+NOUNCOORDINATOR+above/on	LOCATION	to exist/to have
	'The cat is on the chair.'

In all these cases if the noun isn't animate, such as a stone, instead of a cat, the verb iru must be replaced with the verb aru (ある or 有る[possessive]/在る[existential,locative]).

(1)	Ishi	ga	aru.
	石	が	ある
	stone	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'There is a stone.'

(2)	Watashi	wa	ishi	ga	aru.
	私	は	石	が	ある
	I	TOPIC	stone	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'I have a stone.'

(3)	Ishi	wa	isu no ue	ni	aru.
	石	は	椅子の上	に	ある
	stone	TOPIC	chair+NOUNCOORDINATOR+above/on	LOCATION	to exist/to have
	'The stone is on the chair.'

In some cases where 'natural' animacy is ambiguous, whether a noun is animate or not is the decision of the speaker, as in the case of a robot, which could be correlated with the animate verb (to signify sentience or anthropomorphism), or with the inanimate verb (to emphasise that's a non-living thing).

(1)	Robotto	ga	iru.
	ロボット	が	いる
	robot	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'There is a robot' (emphasis on its human-like behavior).

(2)	Robotto	ga	aru.
	ロボット	が	ある
	robot	SUBJECT	to exist/to have
	'There is a robot' (emphasis on its status as a non-living thing).

Russian

In Russian, the accusative of animate nouns that are either masculine singular or masculine or feminine plural coincides with the genitive, while the accusative of inanimate nouns in the same cases coincides with the nominative.
For example, animate noun брат [brat] "a brother" in nominative case, inanimate noun кран [kran] "a crane" in accusative case:

(1)	Брат	поднимает	кран
	Brat	podnimayet	kran
	A brother	lifts	a crane

And on the contrary, брат in accusative case, кран in nominative case:

(2)	Кран	поднимает	брата
	Kran	podnimayet	brata
	A crane	lifts	a brother

Sinhala

In spoken Sinhala there are two existential/possessive verbs: හිටිනවා hiţinawā / ඉන්නවා innawā are used only for animate nouns (humans and animals), while තියෙනවා tiyenawā for inanimate nouns (non-living objects, plants, things, etc.)
For example:

(1)	minihā	innawā
	මිනිහා	ඉන්නවා
	man	there is/exists (animate)
	There is the man

(2)	watura	tiyenawā
	වතුර	තියෙනවා
	water	there is/exists (inanimate)
	There is water

Animacy hierarchy and split ergativity

Animacy can also condition the nature of the morphologies of languages which are split-ergative. In such languages, participants which are more animate are more likely to be the agent of the verb, and therefore are marked in an accusative pattern: unmarked in the agent role and marked in the patient or oblique role. Likewise, less animate participants are inherently more patient-like, and take ergative marking: unmarked when in the patient role and marked when in the agent role. The hierarchy of animacy generally, but not always, is ordered:
The location of the split (the line which divides the inherently agentive participants from the inherently patientive participants) varies from language to language, and in many cases the two classes overlaps, with a class of nouns near the middle of the hierarchy being marked for both the agent and patient roles.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Animacy'.

External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

<a href="http://animacy.totallyexplained.com">Animacy Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.